This case arose out of IPTCA’s contention that MedRisk operates as an alleged unlicensed “middleman” in California’s workers’ compensation system. IPTCA alleges, among other things, that MedRisk engages in a business practice of unlawfully referring patients to providers who provide larger discounts on their services, with MedRisk retaining the difference as profits.

MedRisk disputes the allegations and made the decision to move on from this case after six years of contesting the matter. Additional details regarding the Parties’ contentions are contained in the public filings in this case entitled INDEPENDENT PHYSICAL THERAPISTS OF CALIFORNIA v. MEDRISK, LLC, Cal. Sup. Court, Alameda County, Case No. RG1904504, including the operative Second Amended Complaint.